Legal Opinion
Industrial Commission v. Burckard
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 1924No. 18711PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
By the Court.
In the case of Industrial Commission v. Burckard, No. 18711, the defendant in error, Marie D. Burckard, as a dependent and widow of Charles Burckard, deceased, filed an application for compensation growing out of the death of said Charles Burckard, due to an injury suffered while in the employment of the Ault & Wiborg Company of Cincinnati. The Industrial Commission denied compensation. Upon appeal to the common pleas court a jury was waived and that court allowed compensation, which judgment was affirmed by the Court of Appeals. This proceeding is brought to reverse that…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Renkel v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by12 opinions
- Malone v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1942
- Sebek v. Cleveland Graphite Bronze Co.Ohio Supreme Court · 1947
- Walters v. CeaseAlaska Supreme Court · 1964
- Williams v. Harsco Corp.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1994
- Jasionowski v. Industrial CommissionOhio Court of Appeals · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.