Legal Opinion

Pagano v. Krohn

California Court of Appeal

Decided November 17, 1997No. D022946PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

PRAGER, J. *

Plaintiffs Raymond Pagano and Lillian Pagano (the Paganos), purchasers of the subject condominium, sued the seller and the real estate brokers and agents involved in the sale transaction on various theories arising out of the defendants’ alleged nondisclosure that the property was afflicted with a severe water intrusion problem affecting the entire condominium complex. The Paganos appeal a summary judgment entered in favor of all defendants. The various issues on appeal articulated by the Paganos boil down to whether there are triable issues of fact as to whether the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Salahutdin v. Valley of California, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1994
  2. Sweat v. HollisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1995
  3. Carleton v. TortosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Assilzadeh v. California Federal BankCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Peake v. UnderwoodCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014
  3. Ostayan v. Nordhoff Townhomes Homeowners Ass'nCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  4. Calemine v. SamuelsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  5. (PS) Sharma v. HSI Asset Loan Obligation Trust 2007-1District Court, E.D. California · 2022

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API