Legal Opinion
State v. Stuart
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided November 1, 1990No. 2 CA-CR 89-0297PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ROLL, Presiding Judge.
Charles E. Stuart appeals from convictions for driving while under the influence of intoxicants (DUI), DUI with a blood-alcohol content of .10 percent or more, DUI on a suspended license, and driving with a blood-alcohol level of .10 percent or more, with two prior convictions for DUI. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm Stuart’s convictions but remand the matter for further hearings regarding the prior convictions.
FACTS
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the state, State v. Arredondo, 155 Ariz. 314, 316, 746 P.2d 484, 486 (1987), the facts…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Texas v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Michigan v. ChesternutSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- United States v. DunnSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- People v. LuedemannIllinois Supreme Court · 2006
- State v. BakerIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. AndersonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Campbell v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 2006
- State v. CarterCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.