Legal Opinion

In re Grande's Estate

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided April 26, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Application for limited letters of administration on the estate of ■Carlo Grande. Letters granted.

1Opinion of the Court

COFFIN, S.

The petition of Mary A. Grande shows in her petition that Carlo Grande, her husband, died at his residence in the county of Columbia on May 9, 1912, leaving no will, and leaving him surviving the petitioner, two sisters, and one brother as his only next of kin, and possessed of personal estate not exceeding in value $200, and a right of action against the Empire Brick & Supply Company for the_ death of decedent. She also alleges that Terressa Grande Martelli claims to be a daughter of decedent, which claim petitioner alleges is not true.

On the return of the citation Terressa Grande…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Hunter v. HunterCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Caujolle v. . FerrieNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  3. Clayton v. . WardellNew York Court of Appeals · 1850
  4. Boulden v. McIntireIndiana Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Pittinger v. PittingerSupreme Court of Colorado · 1901

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Barker v. BakerCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1998
  2. Jeanes v. JeanesSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1970
  3. Lau v. LauNew York Supreme Court · 1914

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API