Legal Opinion

Metropolitan Life Insurance v. Kaufman

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided February 20, 1939No. 14,406PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Bock

This review involves a proceeding under sections 11 and 12, chapter 177, ’35 C. S. A., which provide a method for compelling a witness to testify in this state in a case pending in a court of record outside of this state, unless the witness has “a fair and just excuse” for refusal to testify. The law also applies to the issuance of a subpoena duces tecum.

The defendant in error Kaufman, a physician, who does not appear here, asserted as “a fair and just excuse” for his refusal to testify, the protection of the statute making communications between physician and patient privileged, upon…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Epstein v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913
  2. Fearnley v. FearnleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
  3. Elliott v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
  4. State v. LongSupreme Court of Missouri · 1914
  5. Weissman v. WellsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1924

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Hamilton, Superintendent v. VerdowCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1980
  2. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Conyers v. MassaColorado Court of Appeals · 1973
  4. McUne v. FuquaWashington Supreme Court · 1953

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API