Legal Opinion

Amber Coulter v. I.Q. Data

District Court, D. New Jersey

Decided February 3, 2026No. 1:24-cv-06794Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CAMDEN VICINAGE AMBER COULTER, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 24-6794 (RMB-MJS) v. OPINION I.Q. DATA, Defendant. RENÉE MARIE BUMB, Chief United States District Judge THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendant I.Q. Data (“Defendant”). [Docket No. 15.] Having considered the parties’ submissions, the Court resolves the Motion without oral argument. FED. R. CIV. P. 78(b); D.N.J. LOC. CIV. R. 78.1(b). For the reasons set forth below, Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED and the Complaint DISMISSED…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  4. Phillips v. County of AlleghenyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2008
  5. In Re Burlington Coat Factory Securities Litigation. P. Gregory Buchanan, Jacob Turner and Ronald AbramoffCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API