Legal Opinion

Wright v. Csabi (In re Wright)

United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas

Decided February 21, 2017No. CASE NO: 13-10472; ADVERSARY NO. 16-1004PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER AND DENYING DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE DEFENDANTS’ JOINT AMENDED ANSWER

[Resolving ECF Nos. 19, 24, 35]

Eduardo V. Rodriguez, United States Bankruptcy Judge

I. Introduction

Pending before the Court are three motions, self-styled as “Defendants’ Joint Motion for Protective Order,” that was filed on January 24, 2017, and “Defendants’ Motion for leave to File Defendants’ Joint Amended Answer,” that was filed on January 27, 2017. [ECF No.…

2Cases cited19 opinions

Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
Stern v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
Oppenheimer Fund, Inc. v. SandersSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
Seattle Times Co. v. RhinehartSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
Celotex Corp. v. EdwardsSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

In re VelazquezUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas · 2017
DBMP LLC v. THOSE PARTIES LISTED ON APPENDIX A TO COMPLAINT AND JOHN AND JANE DOES 1-1000; OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF ASBESTOS PERSONAL INJURY CLAIMANTS, and SANDER L. ESSERMAN, in his capacity as Legal Representative for Future Asbestos Claimants v. DBMP LLC and CERTAINTEED LLCUnited States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. North Carolina · 2026