Legal Opinion

McManus v. State, Department of Revenue & Finance

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 19, 1993No. 92-727PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LARSON, Justice.

E.J. McManus is a retired federal employee whose retirement benefits were subjected to Iowa income tax at a time when state employees’ retirement benefits were exempted. The United States Supreme Court, in Davis v. Michigan Department of Treasury, 489 U.S. 803, 817, 109 S.Ct. 1500, 1508-09, 103 L.Ed.2d 891, 906 (1989), ruled that this disparate treatment of retirement income violated the Federal Public Salary Tax Act of 1939, 4 U.S.C. § 111.

Effective January 1, 1989, Iowa’s tax statute was amended to end this preferential treatment, but McManus requested a refund of the income…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Davis v. Michigan Department of the TreasurySupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. James B. Beam Distilling Co. v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  5. McKesson Corp. v. Division of Alcoholic Beverages and Tobacco, Fla. Dept. of Business RegulationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Riley v. BoxaSupreme Court of Iowa · 1996
  2. Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  3. Hagge v. Iowa Department of Revenue & FinanceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. McManus v. IowaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API