Legal Opinion
Ferrari Financial Services, Inc. v. RM BPO Consulting LLC and Raju Sharma
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 28, 2026No. 1:25-cv-11733Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS * FERRARI FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC, * * Plaintiffs, * * v. * * Civil Action No. 25-cv-11733-ADB RM BPO CONSULTING LLC and RAJU * SHARMA, * * Defendants. * * * MEMORANDUM AND ORDER BURROUGHS, D.J. Before the Court is Plaintiff Ferrari Financial Services’ (“FFS’s”) motion for default judgment, [ECF No. 23], Defendant Raju Sharma’s motion to stay proceedings, [ECF No. 25], and FFS’s motion to strike, [ECF No. 27]. FFS’s motion to strike, [ECF No. 27], is GRANTED. Under Local Rule 83.5.5, pro se litigants must “provide the clerk and all…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Brockton Savings Bank v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., First United Fund, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1985
- Michael Franco v. Selective Insurance Company, New Jersey Manufacturers Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Benjamin Quirindongo Pacheco v. Jose L. Rolon MoralesCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1992
- Vázquez-Filippetti v. Cooperativa De Seguros Múltiples De Puerto RicoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2013
- Puerto Rico Highway & Transportation Authority v. Redondo Construction Corp. (In Re Redondo Construction Corp.)Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2016