Legal Opinion

Bank v. Martin

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided January 7, 1896PublishedCited by 5 opinions

FROM SUMNER. Appeal from Chancery Court of Sumner County. J. W. BoNNer, J., sitting by interchange.

1Opinion of the CourtBeard, J.

Jo. D. Martin, on November 18, 1893, made a general assignment for the benefit of his creditors. 'Among these were the complainants in the above entitled causes. They, however, repudiated the trust created by this instrument,, and filed their respective bills, attacking it on several grounds as fraudulent in law. On demurrer, the Chancellor entered a decree sustaining the assignment. On appeal, the Court of Chancery Appeals reversed this decree, and remanded the causes to the Court below for further proceedings. The cases are before us on assignment of error to this last decree.

*3By tbe deed in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Phelps v. CurtsIllinois Supreme Court · 1875
  2. Steedman v. Dobbins & DazeyTennessee Supreme Court · 1894
  3. Marks, Rothenberg & Co. v. N. H. & R. L. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Scheibler v. MundingerTennessee Supreme Court · 1888

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. The Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. v. GroverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Murdock Acceptance Corp. v. AaronTennessee Supreme Court · 1950
  3. Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. AlsobrookCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1927
  4. The Wells-Stone Mercantile Co. v. GroverNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Armor v. LewisSupreme Court of Missouri · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API