Legal Opinion

Union & Planters Bank & Trust Co. v. Alsobrook

Court of Appeals of Tennessee

Decided November 25, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSenter, J.

The Union Planters Bank & Trust Company, administrator with the will annexed of Mrs. Mary Alsobrook, filed the original bill in this cause seeking to have the holographic will of Mrs. Mary Alsobrook construed. This holographic will wias duly probated in the probate court of Shelby county and is as follows: “This is my last will. I leave all I have to my son, Ashley Alsobrook and family, to be divided among the children after they become of age. January 12, 1926. Mrs. Mary Also-brook. Witness Miss Bettie Wood.”

The Chancellor construed the will, and decreed in part as follows:

“It further…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hall v. StephensSupreme Court of Missouri · 1877
  2. Nichols v. GuthrieTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Frank v. FrankTennessee Supreme Court · 1908
  4. Fox v. FoxTennessee Supreme Court · 1899
  5. Bank v. MartinTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keeling v. KeelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Cannon v. EwinCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1934
  3. Buntin v. MeriwetherCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
  4. Lasater v. Cumberland Coal CorporationCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1942
  5. Keeling v. KeelingTennessee Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API