Legal Opinion

Becksted v. Nadeau

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Decided June 26, 2007No. 2006-438PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGalway, J.

The plaintiffs, William F. Becksted, Sr., William F. Becksted, Jr. and Becksted Associates, appeal a ruling of the Superior Court ('Morrill, J.) granting a motion by the defendants, J.P. Nadeau, Justin P. Nadeau, the Nadeau Law Offices, P.L.L.C. and Gail C. Nadeau, for a directed verdict on the plaintiffs’ claim under RSA chapter 358-A (1995 & Supp. 2006), the New Hampshire Consumer Protection Act (CPA). We reverse and remand.

The evidence presented to the trial court included the following. The plaintiffs are carpenters whom the defendants hired to build a second-story apartment for Justin…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State v. MoranSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
  2. Preferred National Insurance v. Docusearch, Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  3. Dillman v. New Hampshire CollegeSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2003
  4. In re GiacominiSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2005
  5. Carter v. LachanceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2001

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In re Sony Gaming Networks & Customer Data Security Breach LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2014
  2. Axenics, Inc. v. Turner Construction Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2013
  3. Hair Excitement, Inc. v. L'Oreal U.S.A., Inc.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2009
  4. Beer v. BennettSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2010
  5. Pagan v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2012

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API