Sparks v. Seltzer

OPINION AND ORDER

GERSHON, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Robert Sparks (“Sparks”), on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and the Mental Disability Law Clinic of Touro Law Center, on behalf of its constituents, bring this action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against Charlotte Seltzer and Paulette Floyd 1 in their official capac ities, alleging violations of the class’s First Amendment rights and “zone of privacy”. Pursuant to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, both plaintiffs and defendants move for summary judgment.

FACTS

The material facts pertinent to the resolution of…