Legal Opinion

Chicago & Alton Railroad v. Keegan

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1894PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. George Driggs, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

This is ejectment, brought by the Chicago and Alton Railroad Company, against Frank Keegan and Catherine Keegan, his wife, to recover certain specified parts of lots 2 and 3, in Brainard & Evans’ subdivision of block 2, in canal trustees’ subdivision of the south fractional section 29, township 39, north, range 14, east, in the city of Chicago. The case was tried before the court without a jury, and the court found the defendants not guilty, and rendered judgment accordingly; and from the judgment so rendered the plaintiff company prosecuted this appeal.

The property in controversy is a part…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StevensIllinois Supreme Court · 1876
  2. Abrams v. PomeroyIllinois Supreme Court · 1851
  3. Sykes v. HayesU.S. Circuit Court for the Northern District of Illnois · 1874
  4. Richley v. FarrellIllinois Supreme Court · 1873

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Keal v. RhydderckIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  2. People Ex Rel. Kubala v. WoodsIllinois Supreme Court · 1972
  3. People v. CampbellMichigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Schafer v. RobillardIllinois Supreme Court · 1938
  5. Chicago & Alton Railroad v. KeeganIllinois Supreme Court · 1900

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API