Legal Opinion

Maggio v. Hynes

District Court, E.D. New York

Decided December 10, 1976No. 76 C 2119PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

GEORGE C. PRATT, District Judge.

By motion argued December 3, 1976 plaintiff seeks to enjoin the Deputy Attorney General of the State of New York, Charles J. Hynes, from enforcing a subpoena duces tecum issued pursuant to N.Y. Executive Law § 63(8). Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction is denied.

Defendant, the Special State Prosecutor for Nursing Homes, has attempted to obtain, by means, of a subpoena duces tecum issued to the personal accountant of the plaintiffs, the joint tax returns filed by them for the year 1974. Plaintiffs seek a declaration that the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Couch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,041 Sonesta International Hotels Corporation v. Wellington AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1973
  4. St. Regis Paper Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Town Taxi Inc. v. Police Commissioner of BostonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
  2. Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to B.M. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  3. Richards v. StephensDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1988
  4. United States v. RajaratnamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
  5. BM v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API