Legal Opinion

Subpoena Duces Tecum Issued to B.M. v. State

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided May 17, 1983No. 82-2268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEDEMEYER, P. J. B.M.1

appeals from an order of the trial court requiring him to produce his copies of his federal and state income tax returns and schedules from January 1, 1972, to the present pursuant to a subpoena duces tecum issued under the authority of a John Doe proceeding. We hold that the order violates the fifth amendment2 of the Constitution of the United States and article I, section 8(1)3 of the Wisconsin Constitution because it compels B.M. to incriminate himself. We therefore reverse the order of the trial court.

On September 30, 1981, a subpoena was issued requiring B.M. to…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Garner v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Millie B. Heathman v. United States District Court for the Central District of California,respondentCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  5. State v. WashingtonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1978

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  2. State Ex Rel. Schreiner v. ReifSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
  3. BM v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1983
  4. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. SchamanekUtah Supreme Court · 1984
  5. State Ex Rel. Schreiner v. ReifSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API