Legal Opinion

Hertel v. Ryan

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided October 4, 2019No. 4:18-cv-00203Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Frank Karl Hertel, No. CV-18-00203-TUC-JGZ 10 Petitioner, ORDER 11 v. 12 Charles L Ryan, et al., 13 Respondents. 14 15 Before the Court is Magistrate Judge Lynette C. Kimmins’ Report and 16 Recommendation (R&R) recommending that the District Court dismiss Mr. Hertel’s 17 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed pursuant to

28 U.S.C. § 2254

because the Petition 18 is time-barred. (Doc. 23.) Mr. Hertel has filed an objection, arguing that his Petition should 19 not be time-barred because his Petition was timely…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Thomas v. ArnSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Blakely v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
  3. United States v. Jose Francisco Reyna-Tapia, AKA Jose ReynaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. Pace v. DiGuglielmoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  5. McQuiggin v. PerkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 2013

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API