Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.
District Court, D. Connecticut
1Opinion of the Court
SMITH, District Judge.
On appeal from an interlocutory decree in a patent case granting accounting and permanent injunction against further infringement, D.C., 76 F.Supp. 220, the Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed, 2 Cir., 168 F.2d 691.
Plaintiff moves for entry of order on mandate.
Defendant moves to modify, and vacate in part the interlocutory decree.
There appears to be no question but that the affirmance established the *735propriety of the granting of the injunction as the 'law of the case. This court must conform to the mandate and enter judgment as in the original decree.1 Whether thereafter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Royal Typewriter Co. v. Remington Rand, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Bissell Carpet-Sweeper Co. v. Goshen Sweeper Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1896
- Briggs v. Pennsylvania R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1948
- Eastern Cherokees v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.