Atty. Gen. v. Landel Met. Dist.
Michigan Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
This case involves the construction of sections 6 and 8 of Act No. 312, Pub. Acts 1929 (1 Comp. Laws 1929, § 2275 et seq. [Stat. Ann. § 5.2131 et seq.]), called the metropolitan district act, and relates to the proceedings for incorporation of a metropolitan district. Plaintiff, by leave of the attorney general, has filed in this Court an information in the nature of quo warranto to require the defendants to show cause by what warrant the defendant Landel Metropolitan District claims to be a body corporate and by what warrant the other defendants claim to exercise the powers and privileges of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- State ex rel. Hay v. AldersonMontana Supreme Court · 1914
- City of Jackson v. Com'r of RevenueMichigan Supreme Court · 1947
- Knoxville Water Co. v. KnoxvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Nixon v. City of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1908
- Knoxville v. Knoxville Water Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1901
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.