Legal Opinion

Limpin v. United States

District Court, S.D. California

Decided July 18, 2022No. 3:17-cv-01729Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MELCHOR KARL T. LIMPIN, Case No.: 17-CV-1729 JLS (WVG) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING (1) PLAINTIFF’S 13 v. MOTION FOR COURT’S LEAVE TO AMEND THE ORIGINAL AND 14 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT 15 AND (2) PLAINTIFF’S MOTION Defendant. UNDER FEDERAL RULE OF CIVIL 16 PROCEDURE 60(B)(6) 17 (ECF Nos. 41, 46) 18 19 Presently before the Court are Plaintiff Melchor Karl T. Limpin’s Motion for Court’s 20 Leave to Amend the Original and First Amended Complaint (“Mot. to Amend,” ECF No. 21 41) and Motion…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Pioneer Investment Services Co. v. Brunswick Associates Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Walter Bateman v. United States Postal Service William J. Henderson, 1 Postmaster General, and Aaron Johnson Ben Fukumitsu David Burns Jose MallariCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  4. Eduard Falk and Lettye M. Falk v. Sun Cha AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984
  5. Harvest v. CastroCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API