Legal Opinion
Opinion of the Justices
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided April 19, 1989No. 89-054PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*575The following reply is returned to the Honorable Senate:
The undersigned justices of the Supreme Court submit the following reply to the question presented in your resolution adopted January 11, 1989, and filed in this court on February 6, 1989. Interested parties were permitted to file memoranda with the court until February 23, 1989.
*576Before answering the precise question presented, we briefly examine RSA chapter 168-A, the Uniform Act on Paternity, in order to understand the full import of the proposed amendment. RSA chapter 168-A provides for the support of a child born out of wedlock by the…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- Clark v. JeterSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Little v. StreaterSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mills v. HabluetzelSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pickett v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Opinion of the JusticesSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- Hirst ex rel. Lunt v. DuganSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1992
- State v. ComeauSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1997
- Jessica G. v. Hector M.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- North American Specialty Insurance v. Boston Medical GroupCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2006
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.