Lehrman v. Prague
Supreme Court of Connecticut
1Opinion of the CourtAvery, J.
These two cases were tried together and a single finding of facts made by the court applied to both. No purpose would be served by detailing these facts. Herman Prag and Benjamin Prague are brothers and in 1919 formed a partnership to conduct a retail shoe store in Willimantic. They at first had one store, known as the Modern, and later acquired another, known as the Eagle. Herman Prag, with Max Lehrman, entered into an agreement to purchase the building in which the Modern store was conducted and later made an agreement with Benjamin Prague to transfer to him one-half of his interest in it.…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Cromwell v. County of SacSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- The Haytian RepublicSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Oklahoma v. TextasSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
- Scott v. ScottSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1910
- Wildman v. WildmanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Corey v. Avco-Lycoming DivisionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1972
- International Ass'n of Fire Fighters, Local 46 v. City of EverettWashington Supreme Court · 2002
- Bridgeport Hydraulic Co. v. PearsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1952
- Antman v. Connecticut Light & Power Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
- McCarthy v. WardenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.