Legal Opinion

State v. Raymond

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1995No. 18921, 18995PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

AMUNDSON, Justice.

Roger Raymond (Raymond) appeals both his conviction for sexual contact with a minor (SDCL 22-22-7) 1 and his sentence, which was enhanced under the South Dakota Habitual Offender statute (SDCL 22-7-8). 2 We reverse and remand.

FACTS

Raymond is the uncle of A.Z. (victim). On September 4 or 5, 1993, the seven-year-old victim told D.S. (Mother) that Raymond had “touched her.” Mother did not report this incident to anyone. Victim told her therapist, Patty Schwan (Schwan), about this same incident on September 7, 1993. Victim was receiving counseling from Schwan for many reasons,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. Anthony Damian AzureCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1986
  2. United States v. Manuel P. AmaralCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  3. United States v. Buddy Joe BarnardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1974
  4. State v. LogueSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. United States v. AwkardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1979

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. State v. PellegrinoSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Black v. ClassSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1997
  4. State v. PackedSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
  5. State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API