Legal Opinion
Valley Bank v. State
Supreme Court of New Hampshire
Decided March 31, 1975No. 7067PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGrimes, J.
The issue in this case is whether a “grandfather clause” in the statute regulating branch banking violates the equal protection clauses of the Constitutions of New Hampshire and the United States.
This is an appeal pursuant to RSA 384-B:2 V and RSA 541:6 from a decision of the board of trust company incorporation, the State banking regulatory agency, which granted an application of the Peterborough Savings Bank to establish a branch in the town of Antrim, New Hampshire. The application was granted after a public hearing on September 18, 1974, over the objection of the plaintiff, The Valley…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States Department of Agriculture v. MorenoSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Morey v. DoudSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- United States v. Maryland Savings-Share Ins. Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Commercial Fisheries Entry Commission v. ApokedakAlaska Supreme Court · 1980
- Appeal of The Portsmouth Trust Co.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 1980
- In re Sandra H.Supreme Court of New Hampshire · 2004
- Weeks Restaurant Corp. v. City of DoverSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1979
- Appeal of Portsmouth Savings BankSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1983
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.