Legal Opinion

People v. McMahan

California Supreme Court

Decided June 26, 1901No. Crim. No. 736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

GRAY, C.

—The defendant appeals from a judgment convicting her of embezzlement and from an order denying her a new trial.

The only point urged by appellant is, that the evidence does not show that the crime of embezzlement was committed, for the reasons, — 1. That it fails to show that the property was “ intrusted ” to the defendant; 2. It fails to show that defendant took the money and converted it to her own use.

The facts of the case pertinent to these questions, so far as necessary to state, are as follows: The defendant and the complaining witness were together, in the afternoon, in a room…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. People v. MontarialCalifornia Supreme Court · 1898

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. SteffnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API