Legal Opinion
Martel v. Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided March 16, 1990No. CV 89-2284(RR)PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
RAGGI, District Judge:
Plaintiff, Paul W. Martel, sues his former employer, Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc., for alleged age discrimination pursuant to 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq. (1985 & Supp.1989), the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967. He invokes the court’s pendent jurisdiction to allege analogous violations of the New York Human Rights Law, N.Y. Exec. Law § 290 et seq. (McKinney 1982).
Dean Witter moves for summary judgment on the pendent claim, arguing that plaintiff’s pursuit of state administrative remedies bars subsequent judicial proceedings. Plaintiff opposes…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Giuntoli v. Garvin Guybutler Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1989
- Miller v. LovettCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Alvin PROMISEL, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. FIRST AMERICAN ARTIFICIAL FLOWERS, INC., Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Adames v. Mitsubishi Bank, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1990
- Patel v. Lutheran Medical Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 1991
- Columbian Rope Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Dapelo v. Banco Nacional De MexicoDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1991
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.