Legal Opinion
Columbian Rope Co. v. New York State Division of Human Rights
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 7, 1991PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Order and judgment unanimously affirmed with costs. Memorandum: Respondent Giles A. Wanamaker filed with the federal Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) a complaint of age discrimination and retaliation against his employer, petitioner Columbian Rope Company (Columbian). The EEOC, contrary to Wanamaker’s request, forwarded the complaint to the respondent New York State Division of Human Rights (SDHR) pursuant to a work sharing agreement between the two agencies. The SDHR did not conduct an investigation or a hearing on the matter. Wanamaker commenced an action in Federal District…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Pan American World Airways, Inc. v. New York State Human Rights Appeal BoardNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- Marine Midland Bank, N. A. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
- Scott v. Carter-Wallace, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
- Wanamaker v. Columbian Rope Co.District Court, N.D. New York · 1989
- Kaczor v. City of BuffaloDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1987
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Acosta v. Loews Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Universal Packaging Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- Arcata Graphics Co. v. New York State Division of Human RightsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Peek v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 2007
- Universal Packaging Corp. v. New York State Division of Human RightsNew York Supreme Court · 1998