Kaferstein v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.
New York Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
*1079OPINION OF THE COURT
Edward H. Lehner, J.
The basic legal issue presented on the pending motions regarding plaintiffs claim under Labor Law § 240 (1) is whether the section applies when the plaintiff, who was positioned on the sidewalk, injured his arm when lowering a pipe into the basement of the abutting building.
Before me are motions for summary judgment by: (i) defendants to dismiss the complaint; (ii) third-party defendant General Plumbing Corp. to dismiss plaintiffs claim under Labor Law § 240 (1); and (iii) plaintiff on liability based on his claims against defendants under Labor Law §…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
- Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
- Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
- Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
- Groves v. Land's End Housing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.