Legal Opinion

Kaferstein v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co.

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 20, 2005Published

1Opinion of the Court

*1079OPINION OF THE COURT

Edward H. Lehner, J.

The basic legal issue presented on the pending motions regarding plaintiffs claim under Labor Law § 240 (1) is whether the section applies when the plaintiff, who was positioned on the sidewalk, injured his arm when lowering a pipe into the basement of the abutting building.

Before me are motions for summary judgment by: (i) defendants to dismiss the complaint; (ii) third-party defendant General Plumbing Corp. to dismiss plaintiffs claim under Labor Law § 240 (1); and (iii) plaintiff on liability based on his claims against defendants under Labor Law §…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Ross v. Curtis-Palmer Hydro-Electric Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1993
  2. Rocovich v. Consolidated Edison Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1991
  3. Brill v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. Dunham v. Hilco Construction Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  5. Groves v. Land's End Housing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1992

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API