Legal Opinion

Smith v. Wright

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 12, 1957No. 40,337PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Parker, J.:

This is an action to recover damages for malpractice. Upon the overruling of his demurrer to plaintiffs second amended petition defendant perfected an appeal from that ruling, including in his notice of appeal, as the statute permits (G. S. 1955 Supp., 60-3314a; Western Shale Products Co. v. City of Fort Scott, 175 Kan. 643, 266 P. 2d 327; Standard Steel Works v. Crutcher-Rolfs Cummings, Inc., 176 Kan. 121, 269 P. 2d 402; Brewer v. Hearne Motor Freight Lines, Inc., 179 Kan. 732, 297 P. 2d 1108; Bortzfield v. Sutton, 180 Kan. 46, 299 P. 2d…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Nelson v. SchippelSupreme Court of Kansas · 1936
  2. Foster v. HumburgSupreme Court of Kansas · 1956
  3. Moffet v. Kansas City Fire & Marine InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
  4. Billups v. American Surety Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1951
  5. Estes v. J. A. Tobin Construction Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1944

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Marshall v. DuncanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  2. Broberg v. BolingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Wilson v. Kansas Turnpike AuthoritySupreme Court of Kansas · 1957
  4. Rudy v. WhaleySupreme Court of Kansas · 1961
  5. Vitt v. McDowell Motors, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API