Legal Opinion

Bothamly v. Queal

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1909PublishedCited by 14 opinions

This case was decided by Division A. Appealed from the Circuit Court for Volusia County. The facts in the case are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtCockrell, J.

This is a bill by Queal against Bothamly and wife, setting up the exclusive employment of Bothamly to locate cypress lands for the complainant, the purchase during the employment by Bothamly in the name of his wife of certain cypress lands from the State and praying that the wife be declared to hold the title to these lands in trust for Queal. The separate answers of Bothamly and wife aver in effect that the lands were purchased with the wife’s money and were located by her through another agent while Bothamly was under his employment locating lands for Queal in another part of the State.…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Fisher v. GradySupreme Court of Florida · 1937
  2. Fulton v. Clewiston LimitedSupreme Court of Florida · 1930
  3. Helland v. EvansSupreme Court of Florida · 1934
  4. Meola, Et Ux. v. Sparks, Et Vir.Supreme Court of Florida · 1939
  5. Durham v. DurhamSupreme Court of Florida · 1939

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API