Legal Opinion

United States v. David Simpson

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided July 28, 2017No. 16-3286PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RIPPLE, Circuit Judge.

A jury convicted David Simpson of possession with intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1) and 841(b)(1)(C). He moved for a new trial under Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 33(a), alleging that his trial counsel had been ineffective by failing to investigate and call three witnesses who had potentially exculpatory evidence. The district court declined to conduct an evidentiary hearing and denied the motion because it found “no reasonable possibility” that the proposed testimony of these witnesses would have changed the trial’s outcome. 1 On…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Wiggins v. Smith, WardenSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. United States v. Daniel P. Taglia and Robert J. McDonnellCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1991
  4. Anthony Hall v. Odie Washington, DirectorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1997
  5. Kevin L. Hough v. Rondle AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. United States v. Byron PiersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  2. United States v. Alexander KawleskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
  3. Jones v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Simpson v. United StatesDistrict Court, C.D. Illinois · 2021
  5. United States v. Deon EvansCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2023

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API