Legal Opinion

Stuart v. State

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided December 5, 2007No. 32445PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PERRY, Chief Judge.

Douglas E. Stuart appeals from the district court’s order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.

I

FACTS AND PROCEDURE

Stuart pled guilty to felony eluding a peace officer. I.C. § 49-1404(2)(a). The district court sentenced Stuart to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Stuart filed a pro se application for post-conviction relief. Stuart’s application alleged he was entitled to relief because, among other reasons, he was provided with ineffective assistance of…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  2. Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
  3. State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
  5. Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
  2. Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
  3. Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. Jones v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
  5. State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API