Stuart v. State
Idaho Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
PERRY, Chief Judge.
Douglas E. Stuart appeals from the district court’s order summarily dismissing his application for post-conviction relief. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
FACTS AND PROCEDURE
Stuart pled guilty to felony eluding a peace officer. I.C. § 49-1404(2)(a). The district court sentenced Stuart to a unified term of five years, with a minimum period of confinement of two years. Stuart filed a pro se application for post-conviction relief. Stuart’s application alleged he was entitled to relief because, among other reasons, he was provided with ineffective assistance of…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Roman v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1994
- State v. BearshieldIdaho Supreme Court · 1983
- Murray v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 1992
- Clark v. StateIdaho Supreme Court · 1969
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
- Woodrow Grant v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2014
- Hughes v. StateIdaho Court of Appeals · 2009
- Jones v. ChristensenDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 2021
- State v. DraperIdaho Supreme Court · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.