Legal Opinion
Huske v. Honeywell International Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided January 14, 2004No. CIV.A.03-2003-KHVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
VRATIL, District Judge.
Diane Huske brings claims under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and Section 510 of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1140, against Honeywell International Inc. (“Honeywell”). The matter is before the Court on defendant’s Motion For Summary Judgment (Doc. # 32) filed October 3, 2003. For reasons stated below, the Court sustains defendant’s motion in part.
Summary Judgment Standards
Summary judgment is appropriate if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Dahlin v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A.District Court, D. Colorado · 2021