Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Cohen
Ohio Supreme Court
1Per curiam
Because respondent’s letters to his client state that the threat of criminal charges would be withdrawn if his fees were paid, we find, as did the board, that those threats were solely for the purpose of obtaining an advantage in a civil action and so violated the Disciplinary Rule. We therefore adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.
Judgment accordingly.
Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.
2Cited by7 opinions
- Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
- Butler County Bar Ass'n v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 2008
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. CohenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
- Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HartkeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
- Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Whipple (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.