Legal Opinion

Cincinnati Bar Ass'n v. Cohen

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided July 7, 1999No. 98-2686PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Per curiam

Because respondent’s letters to his client state that the threat of criminal charges would be withdrawn if his fees were paid, we find, as did the board, that those threats were solely for the purpose of obtaining an advantage in a civil action and so violated the Disciplinary Rule. We therefore adopt the findings, conclusion, and recommendation of the board. Respondent is hereby publicly reprimanded. Costs are taxed to respondent.

Judgment accordingly.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, Resnick, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur.

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Cuyahoga County Bar Ass'n v. WiseOhio Supreme Court · 2006
  2. Butler County Bar Ass'n v. CunninghamOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. CohenOhio Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Cincinnati Bar Assn. v. HartkeOhio Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Cleveland Metro. Bar Assn. v. Whipple (Slip Opinion)Ohio Supreme Court · 2022

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API