State v. Hensler
Washington Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBrachtenbach, J.
Defendant was charged with possession of cocaine. A finding of guilt was made by the court upon stipulated facts. We affirm.
The only assignment of error is to the trial court's denial of defendant's motion to suppress inculpatory statements by the defendant and physical evidence derived from those statements.
This case involves a pre-Miranda warning statement and post-Miranda warning statements and physical evidence derived from information in those statements. It is difficult from the record to pinpoint the exact evidence which defendant wanted to suppress. The record does not contain the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Oregon v. ElstadSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- State v. StroudWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- State v. JacksonWashington Supreme Court · 1984
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Simmerman v. U-Haul Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1990
- State v. WaltonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Trimm v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- In Re Estate of KesslerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- State v. PejsaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.