Legal Opinion
Budd v. Hough
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 24, 1929No. Docket No. 6625PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal by plaintiff from an order denying his motion to vacate the judgment and enter a different one upon the ground that the conclusions of law were incorrect, erroneous, and not consistent with nor supported by the findings of fact. No appeal was taken from the judgment, and consequently in that state of the record none of the facts of the case can be considered on this appeal except those embraced in the findings. (Wester velt v. McCullough, 68 Cal. App. 198 [228 Pac. 734].)
The action was one by plaintiff as assignee of C. A. Ricks to recover $1875 claimed to be due…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Gardner v. WatsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Westervelt v. McCulloughCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1924
- Vaughan v. County of TulareCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1922
- Union Lumber Co. v. J. W. Schouten & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1914
- Spotton v. DyerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kinkle v. Fruit Growers Supply Co.California Court of Appeal · 1944
- Newbury v. Civil Service CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Western Talc Co. v. BlaufussCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1938
- Iota Phi Lambda Sorority, Inc. v. Contenta Global Capital Group, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2019