Legal Opinion

Uneeda Doll Co. v. P & M DOLL CO.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided April 30, 1965PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CASHIN, District Judge.

On December 21, 1964 the Register of Copyrights issued to the plaintiff, Uneeda Doll Co., Inc., a certificate of registration covering a doll posed upon a red and white barber pole. On December 23, 1964 that same office issued to Uneeda another certificate covering a doll display box containing a barber pole. (The doll and display box will be referred to as “Baby Trix”).

Uneeda claims that the manufacture and sale of a display box containing a doll clutching a red and white striped pole (“Rosie Posie”) by the P & M Doll Co., Inc., infringes its valid copyrights. Seeking…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Mazer v. SteinSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
  2. Peter Pan Fabrics, Inc. And Henry Glass & Co. v. Martin Weiner Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1960
  3. Nichols v. Universal Pictures CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1930
  4. Baker v. SeldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  5. Alfred Bell & Co. Ltd. v. Catalda Fine Arts, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Uneeda Doll Co., Inc. v. P & M Doll Co., Inc., Salvatore Paganello and Joseph PaganelloCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1965
  2. Richard J. Zitz, Inc. v. PereiraDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1997
  3. Robert Stigwood Group Limited v. SperberDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API