Legal Opinion
Arkla Exploration Company v. Sam Boren, Arkla Exploration Company v. Sam Boren
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided June 10, 1969No. 19445_1PublishedCited by 26 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
VAN OOSTERHOUT, Chief Judge.
Before us are appeals by Sam Boren and associates from judgment entered against them for a balance due on a contract in the sum of $39,039.15 in favor of plaintiff Arkla Exploration Company (Arkla) and dismissing defendants’ counterclaim and from an order denying defendants’ motion for a new trial or in the alternative, for judgment n. o. v. Arkla has cross-appealed from final order denying its post-trial motion for prejudgment interest. Jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship is established.
This litigation arose out of an operating agreement entered into…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Harriet H. Hoffman, of the Estate of Ivan M. Hoffman v. Anthony Celebrezze, Secretary of Health, Education and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1969
- Morse Boulger Destructor Company v. Camden Fibre Mills, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956
- Northern Pac. Ry. Co. v. Haugan (Three Cases)Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1950
3Cited by26 opinions
- Hughes v. Consol-Pennsylvania Coal Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
- McGrath v. Zenith Radio Corp.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981
- United Telecommunications, Inc., a Kansas Corporation v. American Television and Communications Corporation, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1976
- Karlen v. Ray E. Friedman & Co. CommoditiesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1982
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 99,254 Thomas F. Costello, Cross-Appellant v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.