Booth v. Denike
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Texas
Garnishment proceedings by C. D. Booth against Ed. Denike. For a defect in the affidavit for garnishment, J. L. S. Hunt, one of the original defendants, moves to quash the affidavit. Plaintiff moves to amend it.
1Opinion of the Court
MAXEY, District Judge.
In a suit instituted in this court by O. D. Booth as plaintiff. against the firm of Hunt & Booth, composed of J. L. S. Hunt and W. H. Booth, as defendants, judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, May 19, A. D. 1894, against the defendants, Hunt & Booth, for the sum of $5,474.08, with interest thereon. On the 26th of June following, the plaintiff, by his attorney, filed a sworn application for a writ of garnishment to be served upon the said Ed Denike. The affidavit, after reciting the existence of the indebtedness as evidenced by the judgment, proceeds as…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Cooper v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Indianapolis & St. Louis Railroad v. HorstSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Southern Pacific Co. v. DentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Ex Parte FISKSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- NUDD v. Burrows, AssigneeSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert W. Irwin Co. v. Sterling, Inc.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1953
- Tanko v. SapersteinDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1957
- Gengler v. US EX REL. ITS DEPT. OF DEF. AND NAVYDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2006