Legal Opinion

Tanko v. Saperstein

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided January 24, 1957No. 55 C 2250PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HOFFMAN, District Judge.

The defendants in this proceeding have filed their motion to quash a writ of attachment because the affidavit filed in support of the writ was acknowledged before a notary public whose commission had expired. The plaintiffs have filed a counter-motion for leave to file an amended affidavit.

The action, brought for the recovery of a sum allegedly due upon a contract, was originally commenced in the Superior Court of Cook County, Illinois. Since the defendants were citizens and residents of California, not subject to service of process in Illinois, the plaintiffs sought…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Pennoyer v. NeffSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  3. Toland v. SpragueSupreme Court of the United States · 1838
  4. Employers Reinsurance Corp. v. BryantSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Wabash Western Railway v. BrowSupreme Court of the United States · 1896

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Colonial Bank & Trust Co. v. CahillDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1976
  2. Louis Schlesinger Co. v. Kresge FoundationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1964
  3. Arvin Industries, Inc. v. Hampden Specialty Products Corp.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1968
  4. KM Organic Fund, Inc. v. SmithsonDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2020
  5. Shoaff v. GageDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 1958

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API