Ford Motor Co. v. Director of Revenue
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
RIDGELY, Justice:
Petitioner-Appellant Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) appeals the judgment of the Superior Court affirming the determination by the Respondent-Appellee Director of Revenue (the “Director”) that the Director may lawfully impose an unappor-tioned tax on Ford’s receipts from sales of motor vehicles sold to independent dealerships located in Delaware.
Ford makes four arguments on appeal. First, it contends that the Superior Court erred in holding that the Wholesalers’ Gross Receipts Tax (the “Wholesalers’ Tax”) did not violate the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution as…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradySupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Oregon Waste Systems, Inc. v. Department of Environmental Quality of Ore.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Northwestern States Portland Cement Co. v. MinnesotaSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Oklahoma Tax Commission v. Jefferson Lines, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Office of the Chief Medical Examiner v. Dover Behavioral Health SystemSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Walgreens Specialty Pharmacy, LLC v. Comm'r of RevenueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2018