Legal Opinion

State v. Mertz

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 18, 1964No. 39,218PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Murphy, Justice.

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction of the district court and an order of said court denying his motion to vacate the judgment.* 1

*313On May 8, 1958, a complaint was filed in the municipal court of Minneapolis wherein defendant was charged with committing the crime of grand larceny in the first degree, on May 7, 1958, in the city of Hopkins. On May 9 he appeared before said court and waived preliminary examination. Pursuant thereto the case was certified to the District Court of Hennepin County and on that date an information was filed charging him with grand larceny…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fay v. NoiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Sanders v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  3. State v. PruittSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  4. United States v. WeissDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. United States v. EdelsonDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 1950

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Branchaud v. HedmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
  2. State Ex Rel. Lillemoe v. TahashSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
  3. State v. HanfCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2004
  4. Muecke v. StateCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984
  5. Carlton v. StateSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API