Legal Opinion

Barron v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 8, 1936No. 30,895PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Holt, Justice.

Defendant appeals from an adverse judgment. Plaintiff’s action is to recover upon an accident and health policy issued to him by defendant, insuring plaintiff against loss from disease “if such disease shall wholly and continuously disable the Insured and prevent him from performing any and every duty pertaining to his occupation.” Plaintiff alleged that he became totally disabled on August 5, 1984, and Aras continuously disabled until September 8, 1984; that he gave notice of his disability to defendant as soon as it Avas reasonably possible, but payment of the weekly indemnity…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Lindskog v. Equitable Life Assurance Society of United StatesSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1940
  3. Conlon v. Northern Life InsuranceMontana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API