Conlon v. Northern Life Insurance
Montana Supreme Court
1DissentJustice Angstman
The trial court took the view that, since the policy of insurance was admitted without objection, except the general objection to the sufficiency of the complaint, the complaint would be deemed amended to conform to the proof and findings. Whether this view is correct under the facts here is unimpor tant. In considering the propriety of the court’s conclusion that the policy was in effect at the time of Stokke’s death, I will assume that the court was not warranted in deciding the case against defendant on a theory different from that relied upon in the pleadings, if the ground upon which he…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Pfeiffer v. Missouri State Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1927
- Murray Hospital v. AngroveMontana Supreme Court · 1932
- Equitable Life Assurance Society of the United States v. PettidArizona Supreme Court · 1932
- Da Rin v. Casualty Co. of AmericaMontana Supreme Court · 1910
- Bell v. CrivianskyMontana Supreme Court · 1934
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.