Legal Opinion
In Re Cherry
United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas
Decided May 10, 2006No. 05-44629PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MARVIN ISGUR, Bankruptcy Judge.
The parties dispute whether objections to Mr. Cherry’s exemptions were filed timely. For the reasons set forth below, the Court finds that the objections were timely and denies Mr. Cherry’s motion for preemptive dismissal.
Background
On September 9, 2005, the Debtor filed a voluntary petition for bankruptcy under chapter 7. On October 12, 2005, a Rule 2004 examination of the Debtor was conducted. At the examination, Lowell T. Cage (“Trustee”) informed the parties present that there would be insufficient time to conclude matters at the initial…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Taylor v. Freeland & KronzSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- In Re Andrew J. Kontrick, Debtor-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Matador Petroleum Corp. v. St Paul Surplus Lines InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1999
- Schunck v. Santos (In Re Santos)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- In Re Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores Cogliano, Debtor. European American Bank v. Dolores Benedict, A/K/A Dolores CoglianoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Peres v. ShermanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Newman v. White (In Re Newman)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the First Circuit · 2010
- Moyer v. Dutkiewicz (In Re Dutkiewicz)Bankruptcy Appellate Panel of the Sixth Circuit · 2009
- Barry v. Sommers (In Re Cochener)District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
- In Re BaceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2007
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.