Legal Opinion

Bray v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided February 25, 1933No. 22425PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStephens, J.

1. Inflammable gas, when coming in contact with fire, after having been liberated from pipes in which it is usually confined, is a highly dangerous substance, and a duty rests upon one having it under control to exercise due care to prevent its escape where it might become ignited and explode and cause injury and damage. Chisholm v. Atlanta, Gas-Light Co., 57 Ga. 29; 28 C. J. 589, 591; Christo v. Macon Gas Co., 18 Ga. App. 454 (89 S. E. 532) ; Mayor &c. of Unadilla v. Felder, 145 Ga. 440 (89 S. E. 423). Where a company which supplies gas through a pipe to a residence, to be there used for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. WebbSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
  2. Mayor of Unadilla v. FelderSupreme Court of Georgia · 1916
  3. Christo v. Macon Gas Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
  4. People's Gas Light & Coke Co. v. AmphlettAppellate Court of Illinois · 1901
  5. Maynard v. Atlanta Gas-Light Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1919

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Atlanta Gas Light Co. v. GreshamSupreme Court of Georgia · 1990
  2. Community Gas Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1952
  3. Claxton Poultry Co. v. City of ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  4. Fields v. Missouri Power and Light CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  5. Bishop v. Act-O-Lane Gas Service Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1954

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API