Legal Opinion
Charles Earl Alford v. Samuel J. Plumeri, et al.
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided April 24, 2026No. 1:23-cv-20440Unknown
1Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION ECF 42 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY CHARLES EARL ALFORD, Plaintiff, Civ. No 23-20440 (RMB) (EAP) v. OPINION SAMUEL J. PLUMERI, et al., Defendants. BUMB, Chief District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on a Motion to Dismiss filed by Defendants Township of Pennsauken (the “Township”), Anthony Rodriguez (“Rodriguez”), and Lexuus Matos (“Matos”), (collectively “Defendants”) pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(5) and (6), seeking dismissal of Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint. (“Motion to Dismiss” Dkt. No. 42; “Defs’ Brief”…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Lawrence Thomas v. Cumberland CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2014
- Royal Canin U. S. A. v. WullschlegerSupreme Court of the United States · 2025
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.