Legal Opinion
Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. Greenpoint Metallic Bed Co.
District Court, E.D. New York
Decided December 31, 1929No. 4001PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GALSTON, District Judge.
This is a patent infringement action, involving United States letters patent No. 1,388,434 and letters patent No. 1,435,306, the former for a method and apparatus for butt-welding thin-gage tubing, and the latter for butt-welded thin-walled tubing. Both patents have been sustained in this district and by the Circuit Court of Appeals. Elyria Iron & Steel Co. v. Mohegan Tube Co., 7 F.(2d) 827, 829.
In consequence, the issues are necessarily narrowed to a consideration, so far as the question of validity is concerned, to the additional prior art adduced herein, and in the…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Eibel Process Co. v. Minnesota & Ontario Paper Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Loom Co. v. HigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
- McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Thomson Spot Welder Co. v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Harvey Hubbell, Inc. v. General Electric Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Tube Co. v. Steel & Tubes, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1937
- Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. General Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1932
- Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. S. Jackson Tube Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1930
- Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. Clayton Mark & Co.District Court, D. Delaware · 1937
- Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. National Tube Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1935
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.