Legal Opinion

Steel & Tubes, Inc. v. Clayton Mark & Co.

District Court, D. Delaware

Decided July 30, 1937No. 1061PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NIELDS, District Judge.

This is a patent infringement suit of Steel & Tubes,-Inc, plaintiff against Clayton Mark & Co, defendant. The bill ,of complaint charges defendant with infringement of two letters patent.

1. Patent No. 1,388,434, granted August 23, 1921, to Gustav V. Johnston for “Meth-' od & Apparatus for Butt-Welding Thin-Gage Tubing,” with claims 1 and 2 in suit.

2. Patent No. 1,611,875, granted December 28, 1926, to Harry Belmont for “Welding Apparatus” with claims 1 and 2 in suit.

Johnston patent, No. 1,388,434, has been repeatedly held valid and infringed. (See footnote 1.) Belmont…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. McClain v. OrtmayerSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. Tilghman v. ProctorSupreme Court of the United States · 1881
  3. Carnegie Steel Co. v. Cambria Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  4. Merrill v. YeomansSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. Ensten v. Simon, Ascher & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Commonwealth Of Pennsylvania v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  2. Pennsylvania v. BrownCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1967
  3. Finkelstein v. S. H. Kress & Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API