Legal Opinion
Harvey v. District of Columbia
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided December 19, 1996No. Civil Action 96-01865 (CRR)PublishedCited by 38 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CHARLES R. RICHEY, District Judge.
Before the Court in the above-captioned case is the plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration of the Court’s Order of December 2, 1996, granting the defendant partial summary judgment on the plaintiffs claim for sexual harassment under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended. For the reasons expressed below, the Court shall deny the plaintiff’s motion.
A motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) to alter or amend judgment after its entry is not routinely granted. “The primary reasons for reconsideration of judgment are ‘an intervening…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- 66 Fair empl.prac.cas. (Bna) 981, 65 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 43,411 Jane Doe and Mr. Jane Doe v. R.R. Donnelley & Sons CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Coramae Ella Gary v. James Edward LongCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1995
- McMillian v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1996
- Iris McKinney v. Honorable Elizabeth Dole, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1985
- Siobhan R. Koelsch v. Beltone Electronics CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by38 opinions
- Judicial Watch v. Department of ArmyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2006
- Electronic Privacy Information Center v. United States Department of Homeland SecurityDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
- Williams v. SavageDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Ficken v. GoldenDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2010
- Lightfoot v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.